Web3 infrastructure comparison.
Evaluate on what matters.
Choosing Web3 infrastructure is a procurement decision. This page gives the criteria that separate production-grade platforms from demos.
The criteria that matter
Evaluate any Web3 infrastructure provider against these, not marketing claims:
- —Custody model — custodial, MPC, or HSM/KMS non-custodial.
- —Execution guarantees — atomic rollback or partial states.
- —Chain coverage — single, paired, or chain-agnostic.
- —Observability — real-time indexing and audit trails or polling.
- —Pricing — transparent and usage-based or opaque.
Where Eraivo lands
Eraivo is non-custodial (HSM/KMS), atomic, chain-agnostic across EVM/Solana/Cosmos, real-time observable, and priced at $0.002 per intent on mainnet with a free testnet.
Use the detailed platform comparison for the side-by-side against bridges, relayers, and single-chain stacks.
Frequently asked questions
What is the single most important criterion?
Custody and execution guarantees together — non-custodial signing with atomic rollback. They determine your worst-case risk.
How should pricing factor in?
Prefer transparent, usage-based pricing. Eraivo is $0.002 per intent on mainnet, free on testnet.
Where is the side-by-side table?
On the platform comparison page.